|
Miltenyi Biotec
epha2 antibody ![]() Epha2 Antibody, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/epha2 antibody/product/Miltenyi Biotec Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
epha2 antibody - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
recombinant mouse epha2 fc ![]() Recombinant Mouse Epha2 Fc, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant mouse epha2 fc/product/R&D Systems Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant mouse epha2 fc - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
goat anti mouse epha2 antibody ![]() Goat Anti Mouse Epha2 Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/goat anti mouse epha2 antibody/product/R&D Systems Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
goat anti mouse epha2 antibody - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
mouse epha2 ![]() Mouse Epha2, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse epha2/product/R&D Systems Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse epha2 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
anti epha2 antibody ![]() Anti Epha2 Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/anti epha2 antibody/product/R&D Systems Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti epha2 antibody - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
fusion protein epha2 fc ![]() Fusion Protein Epha2 Fc, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/fusion protein epha2 fc/product/R&D Systems Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fusion protein epha2 fc - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
rat monoclonal pe conjugated antibody against mouse epha2 ![]() Rat Monoclonal Pe Conjugated Antibody Against Mouse Epha2, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/rat monoclonal pe conjugated antibody against mouse epha2/product/R&D Systems Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat monoclonal pe conjugated antibody against mouse epha2 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
rabbit monoclonal anti epha2 ![]() Rabbit Monoclonal Anti Epha2, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit monoclonal anti epha2/product/R&D Systems Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit monoclonal anti epha2 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
92/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
rat anti mouse epha2 apc ![]() Rat Anti Mouse Epha2 Apc, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/rat anti mouse epha2 apc/product/R&D Systems Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat anti mouse epha2 apc - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
anti mouse epha2 conjugated with apc ![]() Anti Mouse Epha2 Conjugated With Apc, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 88/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/anti mouse epha2 conjugated with apc/product/R&D Systems Average 88 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mouse epha2 conjugated with apc - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
88/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Cell Signaling Technology Inc
antibody against epha2 ![]() Antibody Against Epha2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/antibody against epha2/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibody against epha2 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
OriGene
epha2 ![]() Epha2, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/epha2/product/OriGene Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
epha2 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Image Search Results
Journal: STAR Protocols
Article Title: Protocol for 3D-guided sectioning and deep cell phenotyping via light sheet imaging and 2D spatial multiplexing
doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2025.104296
Figure Lengend Snippet: 3D light sheet and 2D multi-cyclic imaging data comparison (Mouse Glioblastoma) (A) Imaris 3D surface rendering of autofluorescence (cyan) and glioblastoma target cells stained with anti-GFP-Alexa Fluor 647 nanobody (red). (B) Imaris 3D surface rendering of autofluorescence (cyan) and glioblastoma target cells stained with anti-GFP-Alexa Fluor 647 nanobody (red) with target plane in yellow. (C) Optical section of target plane of interest. (D) Fluorescence image of physical cryosection. (E) MICS image of section shown in D. (F) MICS image indicating anti-GFP-Alexa Fluor 647 nanobody (red) staining. (G) Magnified merged four color multiparameter MICS image with anti-EGFR (magenta), anti-GFAP (green), anti-NeuN (blue), anti-CD146 (yellow). (H–P) Nine exemplary MICS images with merges of anti-GFP-Alexa Fluor 647 nanobody staining (red) and antibody-conjugates against EGFR (H), Neurofilament (I), Nestin (J), GFAP (K), CD44 (L), CD146 (M), NeuN (N), EphA2 (O) and GLAST (P) (gray) (see “Antibodies”). Scale bars: (A–F) 500 μm; (G) 50 μm; (H–P) 500 μm.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Imaging, Comparison, Staining, Fluorescence
Journal: Cancer Research
Article Title: Disruption of EphA2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Leads to Increased Susceptibility to Carcinogenesis in Mouse Skin
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-0004
Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 1. Characterization of EphA2 expression in mouse skin and role of EphA2 in tumor development. A, expression of EphA2 in skin extracts from wild-type and EphA2 knockout mice. Wild-type and EphA2 mutant mice at P8 were sacrificed. Skin tissues were removed from similar regions and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. The frozen tissues were ground, lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer, and subjected to immunoblot with rabbit polyclonal anti-EphA2 antibodies. The same membrane was reprobed for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as loading control. B, expression of h-gal in EphA2 KO mouse skin. Frozen sections were fixed and stained with X-gal followed by counterstaining with nuclear Fast-Red. Bar, 40 Am. C, EphA2 knockout mice are more susceptible to DMBA/TPA two-stage chemical carcinogenesis compared to wild-type mice. Pictures were taken 13 weeks after DMBA initiation.
Article Snippet: The sections were then incubated with goat polyclonal antibodies that recognize the ectodomain of
Techniques: Expressing, Knock-Out, Mutagenesis, Radio Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Membrane, Control, Staining
Journal: Cancer Research
Article Title: Disruption of EphA2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Leads to Increased Susceptibility to Carcinogenesis in Mouse Skin
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-0004
Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 3. Malignant progression of DMBA/TPA–induced tumors in wild-type and EphA2 mutant mice. A, TPA treatment was stopped at 16 weeks after DMBA initiation. Tumors were collected 10 weeks later and processed for staining with H&E (a-e), anti-keratin 14 (f-g), or X-gal (i). a, H&E section of benign lesion from a wild-type (+/+) mouse. b, an invasive carcinoma from a wild-type mouse. c to d, H&E section of an invasive squamous cell carcinoma from a knockout mouse (/). e, H&E section of a spindle cell carcinoma from a knockout mouse. f, keratin 14 staining of an invasive EphA2/ carcinoma showing spindle cells infiltrating into tumor stroma. Bar, 40 Am. B, tumors arising in EphA2 knockout exhibited higher incidence of malignant conversion. Histopathologic examinations were done on the indicated numbers of tumors from each genotype. Tumors with clear evidence of invasive growth were quantitated. The proportion of invasive tumors was significantly different between EphA2+/+
Article Snippet: The sections were then incubated with goat polyclonal antibodies that recognize the ectodomain of
Techniques: Mutagenesis, Staining, Knock-Out
Journal: Cancer Research
Article Title: Disruption of EphA2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Leads to Increased Susceptibility to Carcinogenesis in Mouse Skin
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-0004
Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 5. Compartmentalized expression of EphA2 and ephrin-A1 in mouse skin. A, mice were sacrificed 16 weeks after DMBA initiation. Frozen sections were obtained from tumor-free areas of DMBA/TPA–treated mouse skin and were costained with a goat polyclonal antibody that recognizes EphA2 ectodomain and a rabbit polyclonal anti-ephrin-A1 antibody. Arrows, expression of ephrin-A1 and EphA2 in opposite gradient in outer root shaft; arrowheads, compartmentalized expression of ephrin-A1 and EphA2 in hair bulb. B, insets from (A) showing basal-suprabasal gradient expression of EphA2 and basal expression of ephrin-A1 in epidermis. C, EphA2 and ephrin-A1 expression in untreated normal skin from wild-type mice. Note the thinner epidermal layer in untreated skin compared with thickened epidermis in DMBA/TPA treatment skin shown in (B). D and E, EphA2 was up-regulated during skin tumorigenesis. Skin tumors were dissected and frozen sections with normal skin attached were cut. Tumors from EphA2+/ mice were stained with X-gal (D), whereas tumors from EphA2+/+ mice were stained with a goat polyclonal antibody that recognizes the ectodomain of EphA2 (E). Arrow, normal skin; arrowhead, papilloma. F, representative papillomas from wild-type mice stained for EphA2 and ephrin-A1. Arrows, tumor cells abutting the basement membrane. Bars, 40 Am.
Article Snippet: The sections were then incubated with goat polyclonal antibodies that recognize the ectodomain of
Techniques: Expressing, Staining, Membrane
Journal: Cancer Research
Article Title: Disruption of EphA2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Leads to Increased Susceptibility to Carcinogenesis in Mouse Skin
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-0004
Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 6. EphA2 kinase is required for ephrin-A1-induced inhibition of ERK1/2 MAPK and growth suppression in primary keratinocytes. A, EphA kinase activation by ephrin-A1 in EphA2++ and EphA2 +/ but not EphA2/ keratinocytes. Keratinocytes were isolated from newborn (P1) mice and cultured on Matrigel-coated culture plates. They were stimulated with 1.0 Ag/mL of ephrin-A1-Fc for 10 minutes. The unstimulated cells were used as control. EphA receptors, including EphA2, were precipitated from the cell lysates using ephrin-A1-Fc and were subjected to immunoblot analysis with rabbit polyclonal anti-phospho-EphA/B antibody. Membrane was stripped and blotted again for total EphA2. B, ephrin-A1 stimulation leads to inactivation of ERK1/2 MAPK in EphA2 +/+ and EphA2 +/ but not EphA2/
Article Snippet: The sections were then incubated with goat polyclonal antibodies that recognize the ectodomain of
Techniques: Inhibition, Activation Assay, Isolation, Cell Culture, Control, Western Blot, Membrane
Journal: Biology of Reproduction
Article Title: Expression and functional analyses of ephrin type-A receptor 2 in mouse spermatogonial stem cells
doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioz156
Figure Lengend Snippet: Analysis of EPHA2 expression in spermatogonia. (A, B) RT-PCR analyses of Eph family genes in CDH1-selected testis cells (A) and GS cells (B). (C) Double immunostaining of 7-day-old pup and 6-week-old adult mouse testes using antibodies against EPHA2 and GFRA1, CDH1, or KIT. At least 67 cells (pup) or 52 cells (adult) in 10 fields were counted for each antigen. Arrows and arrowheads indicate cells expressing GFRA1 and CDH1, respectively. (D) Immunostaining of adult human testis using antibodies against EPHA2 and GFRA1. (E) Immunostaining of adult mouse testis using antibodies against EFNA1 and GATA4. Bar = 20 μm (C–E). Asterisk indicates statistical significance (P < 0.05).
Article Snippet: For MACS, dissociated testis cells (2 × 10 7 for wild-type and green mice; 5–10 × 10 7 for ROSA26 mice) were incubated with
Techniques: Expressing, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Double Immunostaining, Immunostaining
Journal: Biology of Reproduction
Article Title: Expression and functional analyses of ephrin type-A receptor 2 in mouse spermatogonial stem cells
doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioz156
Figure Lengend Snippet: Enrichment of mouse SSCs from the adult testis by MACS or FACS. (A) Cell recovery after MACS using anti-CDH1 or anti-EPHA2 antibodies (n = 3). (B) Macroscopic appearance of the recipient testis showing colonization of green mouse testis cells selected by MACS using an anti-EPHA2 antibody. (C) Colony count (n = 18 for EPHA2; n = 16 for control). (D) Fractionation of CDH1-selected ROSA mouse testis cells according to EPHA2 expression levels. Cells in the spermatogonia gate were divided into three populations (EPHA2negative, EPHA2low, and EPHA2high). (E) Real-time PCR analysis of spermatogonia genes (n = 3). (F) Macroscopic appearance of recipient testis transplanted with the EPHA2high population. The three populations of cells were transplanted into the seminiferous tubules of busulfan-treated mouse testes. (G) Colony count (n = 12). (H) Histological appearance of recipient testis showing normal spermatogenesis. Bar = 1 mm (B, F), 10 μm (H). Asterisk indicates statistical significance (P < 0.05).
Article Snippet: For MACS, dissociated testis cells (2 × 10 7 for wild-type and green mice; 5–10 × 10 7 for ROSA26 mice) were incubated with
Techniques: Cell Recovery, Control, Fractionation, Expressing, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Journal: Biology of Reproduction
Article Title: Expression and functional analyses of ephrin type-A receptor 2 in mouse spermatogonial stem cells
doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioz156
Figure Lengend Snippet: Impaired proliferation and increased apoptosis by Epha2 KD in GS cells. (A) Flow cytometric analysis of EPHA2 expression after cytokine (FGF2 and GDNF) supplementation. Cells were cultured without cytokines for 2 days (NF) and then restimulated with FGF2 and GDNF (FG). Cells were analyzed on the next day after cytokine stimulation (n = 3). (B) Flow cytometric analysis of EPHA2 expression of GS cells 5 days after Epha2 KD (n = 3). (C) Cell recovery after Epha2 KD on MEFs. Cells were recovered 6 days after transfection (n = 12). (D) Cell recovery after Epha2 KD on laminin-coated plates (n = 9). GS cells were transfected with shRNA against Epha2, and cells were plated on laminin 2 days after transfection. Cells were recovered 2.5 h after plating. The relative cell recovery from the initially plated cells is indicated. (E) Flow cytometric analysis of ITGA6 expression after Epha2 KD. Fluorescence intensity was determined on the next day after transfection (n = 3). (F) Quantification of proliferating cells by MKI67 staining with at least 528 cells in 14 fields counted. Cells were recovered 4 days after transfection. (G) Quantification of apoptotic cells by TUNEL staining. TUNEL-stained cells were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 with at least 636 cells were counted. Cells were recovered 4 days after transfection. Scramble shRNA was used as a control in all KD experiments Bar = 50 μm (F, G). Asterisk indicates statistical significance (P < 0.05).
Article Snippet: For MACS, dissociated testis cells (2 × 10 7 for wild-type and green mice; 5–10 × 10 7 for ROSA26 mice) were incubated with
Techniques: Expressing, Cell Culture, Cell Recovery, Transfection, shRNA, Fluorescence, Staining, TUNEL Assay, Control
Journal: Biology of Reproduction
Article Title: Expression and functional analyses of ephrin type-A receptor 2 in mouse spermatogonial stem cells
doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioz156
Figure Lengend Snippet: Analysis of EPHA2 and self-renewal factor receptors after Epha2 KD. (A) Western blot analysis of GS cells after Epha2 KD (n = 3). Cells were recovered 5–6 days after transfection. (B) Western blot analysis of GS cells after cytokine stimulation. Cells were cultured without cytokines for 2 days, and samples were collected on the next day after restimulation with FGF2 and GDNF. (C–E) Immunoprecipitation using antibodies against EPHA2 (C), RET (D), or FGFR2 (E).
Article Snippet: For MACS, dissociated testis cells (2 × 10 7 for wild-type and green mice; 5–10 × 10 7 for ROSA26 mice) were incubated with
Techniques: Western Blot, Transfection, Cell Culture, Immunoprecipitation
Journal: Biology of Reproduction
Article Title: Expression and functional analyses of ephrin type-A receptor 2 in mouse spermatogonial stem cells
doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioz156
Figure Lengend Snippet: Functional analysis of Epha2 by spermatogonial transplantation. (A) Real-time PCR analysis of spermatogonial markers after Epha2 KD (n = 3). Cells were recovered 4 days after transfection, and the relative expression levels were determined by measuring the ratio between the experimental shRNA and control shRNA (indicated by the horizontal bar). (B) Cell recovery after transfection (n = 3). Cells were collected 2 days after transfection. (C) Real-time PCR analysis of Epha2 expression using GS cells (n = 3). GS cells were transfected by lentiviruses that express shRNA against Epha2. Cells were recovered on the next day after transfection. (D) Macroscopic appearance of recipient testis transplanted with pup testis cells after Epha2 KD or Epha2 CA OE. (E) Colony count (n = 17 for Epha2 KD; n = 18 for Epha2 CA). (F, G) Immuno- (F) or lectin (G) staining of recipient testes. Bar = 1 mm (D), 20 μm (F, G). Asterisk indicates statistical significance (P < 0.05).
Article Snippet: For MACS, dissociated testis cells (2 × 10 7 for wild-type and green mice; 5–10 × 10 7 for ROSA26 mice) were incubated with
Techniques: Functional Assay, Transplantation Assay, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Transfection, Expressing, shRNA, Control, Cell Recovery, Staining
Journal: Cell Adhesion & Migration
Article Title: EphA2 promotes cell adhesion and spreading of monocyte and monocyte/macrophage cell lines on integrin ligand-coated surfaces
doi: 10.1080/19336918.2015.1107693
Figure Lengend Snippet: Expression of endogenous and exogenous/dominant negative EphA2 in U937, EphA2ΔC-EGFP-U937, J774.1, and EphA2ΔC-EGFP-J774.1 cells. ( A ) Typical phase contrast and fluorescence micrographs highlighting the expression of the EphA2ΔC-EGFP protein. ( B ) EphA2 mRNAs amplified from the intracellular and extracellular regions by RT-PCR showing the expression of endogenous and total (endogenous plus exogenous) EphA2, respectively, in U937 and its subline. Densitometric quantification of the RT-PCR amplification levels of EphA2 from 3 independent experiments normalized to the levels of GAPDH. Data is presented as the mean ± SD. ** P < 0.01. ( C ) Amplification of endogenous and exogenous EphA2 in J774.1 cells and their subline cells by RT-PCR. Densitometric quantification of the RT-PCR amplification levels were determined from 3 independent experiments and normalized to the levels of GAPDH. Data is presented as the mean ± SD.
Article Snippet: The
Techniques: Expressing, Dominant Negative Mutation, Fluorescence, Amplification, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction
Journal: Cell Adhesion & Migration
Article Title: EphA2 promotes cell adhesion and spreading of monocyte and monocyte/macrophage cell lines on integrin ligand-coated surfaces
doi: 10.1080/19336918.2015.1107693
Figure Lengend Snippet: Representative histograms showing EphA2 and/or EGFP expression in U937 and EphA2ΔC-EGFP-U937 cells ( A ) as well as J774.1 and EphA2ΔC-EGFP-J774.1 cells ( B ).
Article Snippet: The
Techniques: Expressing
Journal: Cell Adhesion & Migration
Article Title: EphA2 promotes cell adhesion and spreading of monocyte and monocyte/macrophage cell lines on integrin ligand-coated surfaces
doi: 10.1080/19336918.2015.1107693
Figure Lengend Snippet: Molecular association of EphA2 with the β2 integrin/ICAM1 ( A ) and β2 integrin/VCAM1 complexes ( B ) in U937 and EphA2ΔC-EGFP-U937 cells.
Article Snippet: The
Techniques:
Journal: Cell Adhesion & Migration
Article Title: EphA2 promotes cell adhesion and spreading of monocyte and monocyte/macrophage cell lines on integrin ligand-coated surfaces
doi: 10.1080/19336918.2015.1107693
Figure Lengend Snippet: Primers and cycle numbers for PCR amplification used in U937 cells
Article Snippet: The
Techniques: Amplification
Journal: Cell Adhesion & Migration
Article Title: EphA2 promotes cell adhesion and spreading of monocyte and monocyte/macrophage cell lines on integrin ligand-coated surfaces
doi: 10.1080/19336918.2015.1107693
Figure Lengend Snippet: Primers and cycle numbers for PCR amplification used in J774.1 cells
Article Snippet: The
Techniques: Amplification
Journal: Cells
Article Title: The EphA2 Receptor Regulates Invasiveness and Drug Sensitivity in Canine and Human Osteosarcoma Cells
doi: 10.3390/cells13141201
Figure Lengend Snippet: EphA2 is overexpressed in osteosarcoma cells. ( A ) Canine osteosarcoma cells Abrams, Eva, McKinley, Gracie, D17, Payton, and Igler, as well as non-malignant canine osteoblast cells (CnOb), were lysed and EphA2 expression was analyzed by Western blotting using an anti-EphA2 antibody. Tubulin expression was used as a loading control. EphA2 expression was quantified by densitometry, normalized on corresponding tubulin controls, and presented as percentages relative to osteoblast control (100%). The graph summarizes three independent experiments. ( B ) EphA2 expression in human osteosarcoma cells U2OS, SAOS2, MG-63, SJSA1, and 143B, as well as in non-malignant human osteoblast cells (hOb), was analyzed as in A. The graph summarizes three independent experiments. ( C ) EphA2 expression in the indicated canine osteosarcoma cell lines, a commercially available canine osteoblast cell line (CnOb), and 3 in-house preparations of canine primary osteoblasts (cOb-1-3) isolated from femoral bone samples were assessed by Western blotting and quantified as in A. The graph presents EphA2 signal intensity as arbitrary units (AU). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; n.s. statistically not significant.
Article Snippet: The primary
Techniques: Expressing, Western Blot, Control, Isolation
Journal: Cells
Article Title: The EphA2 Receptor Regulates Invasiveness and Drug Sensitivity in Canine and Human Osteosarcoma Cells
doi: 10.3390/cells13141201
Figure Lengend Snippet: EphA2 promotes osteosarcoma cell proliferation. ( A ) Indicates that canine and human osteosarcoma cells were transduced with a specific shRNA targeting EphA2 (shA2) or with a non-silencing, scrambled shRNA (NS, control). EphA2 expression was then assessed by Western blotting using a specific anti-EphA2 antibody. ( B ) Abrams-NS and Abrams-shA2 cells were grown on glass coverslips to 70% confluency, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and stained with anti-EphA2 (green), rhodamine phalloidin (cytoskeleton, red) and DAPI (cell nucleus, blue). Staining with a matching non-specific IgG was shown as specificity control. Fluorescent images were taken using an Olympus IX83 microscope at 200× magnification. Scale bar, 100 µm. ( C ) Indicates that cells were seeded in 96-well plates (2 × 10 3 cells per well, n ≥ 6) and cultured for 48 h. To assess cell viability, resazurin was added to the wells, and the fluorescence was measured after 4 h using a Varioskan LUX plate reader. Data are shown as mean ± SD. Experiments were repeated three times. *** p < 0.001.
Article Snippet: The primary
Techniques: Transduction, shRNA, Control, Expressing, Western Blot, Staining, Microscopy, Cell Culture, Fluorescence
Journal: Cells
Article Title: The EphA2 Receptor Regulates Invasiveness and Drug Sensitivity in Canine and Human Osteosarcoma Cells
doi: 10.3390/cells13141201
Figure Lengend Snippet: EphA2 affects osteosarcoma cell motility and invasion. ( A ) Human 143B-NS and 143B-shA2, and canine Eva-NS and Eva-shA2 cells were seeded into 6-well plates (5 × 10 5 cells per well) in triplicates and cultured to form confluent monolayers. Using a 200 µL pipette tip, a wound/scratch was made in each monolayer, and wells were rinsed with medium to remove cell debris. Wound closure was monitored over time by imaging the same area of each wound (2 per scratch) using an inverted microscope at 40× magnification. Wound width in each image was measured using Microsoft PowerPoint. Graphs represent percentages of wounds closed at each timepoint relative to wound width at 0 h. Scale bar, 100 µm. ( B ) The indicated canine ( top ) and human ( bottom ) cells were seeded into transwell inserts (2 × 10 4 cells per insert) in serum-free media ( n = 3 per group). Cell culture media with 10% FBS was added to the lower chamber of each insert, and cells were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. For assessing cell migration after 24 h, cells residing on the upper side of each insert porous membrane were removed by a cotton swab, and migrated cells at the lower surface of the membrane were fixed with methanol, stained with crystal violet, and counted. For cell counting, five selected fields of each insert were imaged at 100× magnification, and the average number of cells per field was calculated. Graphs represent percentages of migrated EphA2-silenced cells relative to that of matching non-silenced controls. ( C , D ) The indicated cells were serum-starved for 24 h and seeded into Matrigel-coated transwell inserts (2 × 10 4 cells per well) in serum-free media ( n = 3 per group). The lower chamber contained media with 10% FBS. After 48 h, the number of invaded cells at the lower surface of insert porous membranes were quantified and graphed as in ( B ). ( E ) Migration assays were conducted using canine Eva and human MG63 (3 × 10 4 cells per insert) OS cells as in ( B ). Soluble ephrinA1 ligand or IgG (1 µg/mL) was added to the upper chamber at cell seeding. Graphs summarize data from two independent experiments and represent the percentage of migrated cells relative to IgG controls. Data are shown as mean ± SD. Experiments were repeated three times unless otherwise indicated. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Article Snippet: The primary
Techniques: Cell Culture, Transferring, Imaging, Inverted Microscopy, Incubation, Migration, Membrane, Staining, Cell Counting
Journal: Cells
Article Title: The EphA2 Receptor Regulates Invasiveness and Drug Sensitivity in Canine and Human Osteosarcoma Cells
doi: 10.3390/cells13141201
Figure Lengend Snippet: EphA2 increases resistance to cisplatin. ( A ) The indicated canine OS cells were seeded into 96-well plates (4 × 10 3 cells per well) and allowed to adhere to the wells overnight. Culture media was replaced the next day with media containing increasing concentrations of cisplatin or media with PBS (as solvent control) at the volume matching the highest cisplatin dose as indicated ( n = 3 per group). The treated cells were cultured for 48 h. To assess cell survival, resazurin was added to the wells, and the fluorescence signal was quantified as in C. ( B ) The indicated human OS cells were tested for cisplatin sensitivity as described in A. Graphs represent cell survival as percentages relative to matching solvent controls. Data are shown as mean ± SD. Experiments were repeated three times. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Article Snippet: The primary
Techniques: Solvent, Control, Cell Culture, Fluorescence
Journal: Cells
Article Title: The EphA2 Receptor Regulates Invasiveness and Drug Sensitivity in Canine and Human Osteosarcoma Cells
doi: 10.3390/cells13141201
Figure Lengend Snippet: EphA2 affects osteosarcoma cell morphology. ( A , B ) The indicated canine and human OS cells were seeded into 6-well plates (50 cells per well, n = 3 per group) and allowed to grow into colonies for 7 days. Colonies were fixed with methanol and stained with crystal violet. The number of clustered, partially clustered, and spread colonies in each well were counted, and representative images were captured using a light microscope at 40× magnification. Graphs represent the proportion of each category of colonies relative to the total number of colonies. Representative images of these colonies are shown. ( C ) 143B-NS and 143B-shA2 cells were grown on glass coverslips to 50% confluency, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and stained with rhodamine phalloidin (actin cytoskeleton, red) and DAPI (cell nucleus, blue). Fluorescent images were taken using an Olympus IX83 microscope at 200× magnification. Scale bar, 100 µm. Data are shown as mean ± SD. Experiments were repeated three times. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Article Snippet: The primary
Techniques: Staining, Light Microscopy, Microscopy
Journal: Cells
Article Title: The EphA2 Receptor Regulates Invasiveness and Drug Sensitivity in Canine and Human Osteosarcoma Cells
doi: 10.3390/cells13141201
Figure Lengend Snippet: EphA2 promotes osteosarcoma tumor growth. ( A ) Abrams-NS and Abrams-shA2 osteosarcoma cells were injected subcutaneously in the flank area of 4–8-week-old male immunodeficient NOD–SCID gamma mice (1.0 × 10 6 cells per mouse in 100 µL PBS, n = 4 per group). Tumor growth was monitored every 3–4 days, and tumor volume was calculated as a 2 × b/2, where a and b are the short and long diameters, respectively. The graph represents a summary of two independent experiments. ( B ) Eva-NS and Eva-shA2 cells were injected and tumor growth was monitored as in A ( n = 6 per group). The graph represents one of two independent experiments. Data are shown as mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Article Snippet: The primary
Techniques: Injection
Journal: Cells
Article Title: The EphA2 Receptor Regulates Invasiveness and Drug Sensitivity in Canine and Human Osteosarcoma Cells
doi: 10.3390/cells13141201
Figure Lengend Snippet: EphA2 affects multiple signaling pathways in human and canine osteosarcoma cells. The indicated cells were cultured to approximately 70% confluency, serum-starved overnight, and the phosphorylation status of various proteins, as well as the expression of N-cadherin and Integrin β3, was assessed by Western blotting.
Article Snippet: The primary
Techniques: Protein-Protein interactions, Cell Culture, Phospho-proteomics, Expressing, Western Blot